PATIENTS WITH ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE AND MULTIVESSEL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AFTER SUCCESSFUL STENTING CLINICAL-RELATED ARTERY IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME WITHOUT ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION: A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR COMPLETE MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION

PATIENTS WITH ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE AND MULTIVESSEL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AFTER SUCCESSFUL STENTING CLINICAL-RELATED ARTERY IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME WITHOUT ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION: A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR COMPLETE MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION

07.01.2020
автор usajournal
1 мин. на чтение
Выбор валюты
Дата публикации статьи в журнале: 8.08.2019
Название журнала: Американский Научный Журнал, Выпуск: № (27) / 2019, Том: 1, Страницы в выпуске: 4-6
Автор:
Kostroma , Kostroma Regional Clinical Hospital named after Korolev E.I, Candidate of Medicine Sciences
Автор: Leonid V. Popov
Kostroma , Kostroma Regional Clinical Hospital named after Korolev E.I, Doctor of Medical Sciences
Автор:
, ,
Анотация: Annotation. In patients with ischemic heart disease and multivessel lesions after successful stenting of the clinical-dependent artery using stents of the 3rd generation with drug coating for acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation and intermediate severity of lesions on the SYNTAX SCORE, when performing full functional revascularization, there are no differences in the indicators of large cardiovascular events between coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary interventions
DOI:
Данные для цитирования: Aleksandr V. Bocharov Leonid V. Popov . PATIENTS WITH ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE AND MULTIVESSEL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AFTER SUCCESSFUL STENTING CLINICAL-RELATED ARTERY IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME WITHOUT ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION: A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR COMPLETE MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION. Американский Научный Журнал. Медицинские науки. 8.08.2019; № (27) / 2019(1):4-6.

View Fullscreen
Список литературы: References: 1. Chazova I.E., Oschepkova E.V. Fight with cardiovascular disease: problems and ways to solve them at the present stage. Bulletin Roszdravnadzor. 2015; 5: 7 – 10 2. Bockeria L.A., Alekyan B.G. Endovascular diagnosis and treatment of disease of the heart and blood vessels in Russian Federation – 2015. Moscow: Nauchnyy Tsentr Serdechno-Sosudistoy Khirurgii imeni A.N. Bakuleva Rossiyskoy Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk; 2016 3. Fukui T., Tabata M. Early and long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with left main disease: single-center results of multidisciplinary decision making. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 62(5): 301 – 307 4. Patrono C., Collet J.-Ph., Mueller Ch. et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. European Heart Journal. 2015. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320 5. Ranasinghe I., Alprandi-Costa B., Chow V., Elliot J.M. et al. Risk stratification in the setting of nonST elevation acute coronary syndromes 1999-2007. Am J Cardiol. 2011; 108: 617 - 624 6. Ben-Gal Y., Moses J.W., Mehran R., Lansky A.J. et al. Surgical versus percutaneous revascularization for multivessel disease in patients with acute coronary syndromes: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3: 1059 - 1067 7. Palmerini T., Genereux P., Caixeta A., Cristea E. et al. Prognostic value of the SYNTAX score in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57: 2389 - 2397